Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.
Date: 2004-04-01 02:56:29
Message-ID: 200404010256.i312uTk21591@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Robert Treat wrote:
> PostgreSQL users indicate that improvements in some areas are
> contemplated, but the next version of PostgreSQL may come as late as two
> years from now, and the community that drives PostgreSQL development is
> not committing to any particular improvements.
> 
> # uh... two years out... i couldn't come up with an explanation for
> that...  well, many of these features are planned for in 7.5, and I
> wonder if it is worth coming up with a "response" to the information
> above #
> 

These guys obviously didn't do much work in generating the report.  We
have never hard two years between a release, in fact never more than
one.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-01 03:04:59
Subject: Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-01 02:50:21
Subject: Re: Update on PITR

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group