Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Update on PITR

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update on PITR
Date: 2004-04-01 03:25:37
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-pitr
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> > Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
> > If so, how about farming out some of it?  I'd be willing to contribute
> > some effort to PITR.  (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
> > wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
> What is RedHat's interest in PostgreSQL?  Last time I heard they weren't
> interested in their database product anymore.  Why do they care about
> the PostgreSQL project?

Just speculation, but I'd go with end goal being to be able to dump Oracle
altogether, once PostgreSQL actually has all the various enterprise
features ...

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: pgsqlDate: 2004-04-01 04:00:05
Subject: GUID
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-01 02:50:21
Subject: Re: Update on PITR

pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

Next:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2004-04-01 19:42:05
Subject: Re: Update on PITR
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-01 02:50:21
Subject: Re: Update on PITR

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-04-01 03:27:56
Subject: Re: Best open source db poll currently
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-01 03:04:59
Subject: Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group