Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Update on PITR

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update on PITR
Date: 2004-04-01 03:25:37
Message-ID: 20040331232457.F91030@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-pitr
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> > Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
> > If so, how about farming out some of it?  I'd be willing to contribute
> > some effort to PITR.  (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
> > wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
>
> What is RedHat's interest in PostgreSQL?  Last time I heard they weren't
> interested in their database product anymore.  Why do they care about
> the PostgreSQL project?

Just speculation, but I'd go with end goal being to be able to dump Oracle
altogether, once PostgreSQL actually has all the various enterprise
features ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: pgsqlDate: 2004-04-01 04:00:05
Subject: GUID
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-01 02:50:21
Subject: Re: Update on PITR

pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

Next:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2004-04-01 19:42:05
Subject: Re: Update on PITR
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-01 02:50:21
Subject: Re: Update on PITR

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-04-01 03:27:56
Subject: Re: Best open source db poll currently
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-01 03:04:59
Subject: Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group