Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Date: 2004-03-31 22:41:22
Message-ID: 200403311441.22936.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-sql
Tom,

> This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious
> inquiry.  Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they
> need?  In sufficient detail that we could actually answer?

Ok, talked with him.   They are trying to plan OO-->DB mapping in 3 
programming languages for a large project.   Large enough that they would 
cost out implementing these SQL99 features for us if they like PostgreSQL 
otherwise.    But they *do* need to complete the checklist for each candidate 
database system.

So ... can anyone more familiar with SQL99 than me give some feedback?

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: David CostaDate: 2004-03-31 23:01:49
Subject: Advocacy initiative PHP5/PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Bernard ClementDate: 2004-03-31 21:20:46
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Best open source db poll currently

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-03-31 23:49:29
Subject: Re: left join on a view takes significantly more time.
Previous:From: Manuel SugawaraDate: 2004-03-31 18:55:57
Subject: left join on a view takes significantly more time.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group