Re: logging statement levels

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logging statement levels
Date: 2004-03-31 02:42:11
Message-ID: 200403310242.i2V2gB000840@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > If nobody is working on this I am prepared to look at it:
> >
> > . Allow logging of only data definition(DDL), or DDL and modification
> > statements
> >
>
>
>
> Here are some options:
>
> 1. change the type of "log_statement" option from boolean to string,
> with allowed values of "all, mod, ddl, none" with default "none".
> 2. same as 1. but make boolean true values synonyms for "all" and
> boolean false values synonyms for "none".
> 3. keep "log_statement" option as now and add a new option
> "log_statement_level" with the same options as 1. but default to "all",
> which will have no effect unless "log_statement" is true.

I like 1.

> Also, I assume "modification statements" means insert/update/delete, or

Yes.

> are we talking about DDL mods (like "alter table")?

Alter is DDL.

> Finally, what about functions that have side effects? It would be nice
> to be able to detect the statements to be logged at the syntactic level,
> but it strikes me that that might not be possible.

Not possible.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2004-03-31 06:43:15 Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-03-31 01:36:36 Re: pg_dump end comment

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-31 04:46:11 Re: [GENERAL] psql's "\d" and CLUSTER
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-03-31 01:36:36 Re: pg_dump end comment