Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Date: 2004-03-31 06:14:46
Message-ID: 200403302214.46154.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-sql
Tom,

> This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious
> inquiry.  Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they
> need?  In sufficient detail that we could actually answer?

I'll ask, but I'm not sure that I can.   The particular company is very 
bureaucratic, and I doubt the person who asked me has any control over the 
questionnaire.

-- 
-Josh Berkus

______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
                                        Josh Berkus
   Complete information technology 	josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
    and data management solutions 	(415) 565-7293
   for law firms, small businesses 	 fax 651-9224
    and non-profit organizations. 	San Francisco


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-31 16:35:14
Subject: Re: Update on PITR
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-31 05:18:26
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2004-03-31 08:31:01
Subject: Re: plpgsql vs. SQL in stored procedures
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-31 05:18:26
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group