Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>,"Jaime Casanova" <el_vigia_ec(at)hotmail(dot)com>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
Date: 2004-03-30 16:43:01
Message-ID: 200403300843.01437.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Jaime, Richard,

> That's going to depend on a number of things:
> There are some test results people have provided in the archives, but
> whether they apply to your setup is open to argument.

True.  On Linux overall, XFS, JFS, and Reiser have all looked good at one time 
or another.   Ext3 has never been a leader for performance, though, so that's 
an easy elimination.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2004-03-30 17:28:59
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-03-30 16:38:50
Subject: Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group