| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Two-phase commit |
| Date: | 2004-03-23 18:28:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20040323182843.GF3863@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 06:10:35PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I have again updated my two-phase commit patches. Only minor
> modifications.
>
> I haven't received any comments and there hasn't been any discussion on
> the implementation, I suppose that nobody has given it a try. :(
I haven't tried it, but I see it conflicts big time with my
modifications in access/transam/xact.c for subtransactions support.
I am currently writing a proposal for nested transactions which will go
to -hackers, and I will be posting some code to -patches shortly
thereafter which should give you an idea where I am heading. Maybe then
we can have the opinion from the devel community about both things,
whether they should be applied or not.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"El miedo atento y previsor es la madre de la seguridad" (E. Burke)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-03-23 18:59:07 | Nested transaction proposal - take N (N > 2) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-23 18:20:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Two-phase commit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-03-23 19:53:06 | dollar quoting and pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-23 18:20:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Two-phase commit |