Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: linked list rewrite

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: linked list rewrite
Date: 2004-03-23 18:16:51
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:
> (1) API naming
> In the latest prototype implementation, I've adopted a completely new 
> naming convention for the functions in the list API. The new API looks 
> like:
> List *list_append(List *list, void *datum);
> List *list_prepend(List *list, void *datum);
> List *list_conc(List *list1, List *list2);
> bool list_member(List *list, void *datum);
> List *list_remove(List *list, void *datum);
> etc.
> Function variants which operate on integer lists (type = T_IntList) 
> have an "_int" suffix, whereas OID list functions use an "_oid" suffix. 
> By default, list operations use structural equality (i.e. equal()) -- 
> if a list function uses pointer equality to determine if two list 
> elements are the same, it has the "_simple" suffix. And so on.
> In contrast, the existing List API is a lot more inconsistent (IMHO). I 
> elaborated on some of the deficiencies of the existing API naming 
> scheme here:
> Tom objected to changing the names:

I agree a renaming of list functions is good.  If we had kept the
original Berkeley code as-is, we would have a lot fewer developers
today.  :-)  Making drastic cleanups is often worthwile.  I write
backend code and still can't remember which list function does what, so
clearer naming would help me a lot, and I am sure others too.

Tom had the idea of making compatible names for the old macros, and I
think that is an excellent compromise.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-03-23 18:20:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two-phase commit
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-23 18:06:43
Subject: Re: bug in 7.4 SET WITHOUT OIDs

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Matthew HixsonDate: 2004-03-23 18:24:47
Subject: patterns for database administration
Previous:From: Dustin SallingsDate: 2004-03-23 17:18:11
Subject: Re: linked list rewrite

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group