Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking

From: Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Date: 2004-03-18 19:18:40
Message-ID: 20040318191840.GA7088@ping.be (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:50:32PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I'm not sure I believe these numbers at all... my experience is that
> > getting trustworthy disk I/O numbers is *not* easy.
> 
> These numbers were reproducable on all the platforms I tested.

It's not because they are reproducable that they mean anything in
the real world.


Kurt


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-03-18 19:22:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Previous:From: Michael AdlerDate: 2004-03-18 18:52:37
Subject: string casting for index usage

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-03-18 19:22:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Previous:From: Fabien COELHODate: 2004-03-18 19:00:29
Subject: Re: syntax error position "CREATE FUNCTION" bug fix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group