Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
Date: 2004-03-17 20:47:15
Message-ID: 20040317164628.L49804@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> /usr/local/libexec/ppf_verify: pgp command failed
>
> gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
> gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 16 23:11:34 2004 AST using DSA key ID 14964AC8
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> > this has/had nothing to do with core ... this was a project that Josh
> > started ...
>
> Yet Josh Berkus wrote on March 9:
>
> > Hmmmm ... let me apologize for not directly addressing this list about the
> > "final plans" for GForge/pgFoundry, and try to remedy the situation now. I
> > spent so much time discussing this on Hackers that I failed to notice that
> > this list got cut off the CC before we reached a conclusion.
> >
> > Marc, Chris Ryan, Andrew D. and the Core *have* been in the loop on this.

Core's involvement has pretty much been "do we want to look at migrating
to GForge?  sure, why not?" ...


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Chris RyanDate: 2004-03-18 02:43:30
Subject: Re: Gborg CVS Commit Messages
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-03-17 16:56:48
Subject: Re: Gborg CVS Commit Messages

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Matthew T. O'ConnorDate: 2004-03-17 20:57:09
Subject: Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart
Previous:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2004-03-17 20:37:28
Subject: Re: Further thoughts about warning for costly FK checks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group