Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

From: "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Date: 2004-03-12 15:50:54
Message-ID: 20040312155054.GV39391@xs4all.nl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:37:58AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Well, if you want to think along those lines, I believe that we (PGDG)
> currently hold these domain names:

[...]

> 	postgres.org

This is the one I was silently rooting for, but figured was too good to
be true.


> You could make a case that postgres.org for the projects would be the
> perfect complement to postgresql.org for the core.
 
Still _slightly_ confusing, but I think the plain and simple idea of a
prominent banner was mentioned.  We can have them both ways to avoid all
confusion.  I say go for it!


Jeroen


In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-03-12 15:56:40
Subject: Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-03-12 15:49:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-03-12 15:56:40
Subject: Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-03-12 15:49:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group