From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
Date: | 2004-03-12 14:55:54 |
Message-ID: | 20040312145554.GS39391@xs4all.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 02:42:47PM -0000, Dave Page wrote:
>
> We need some distinction between the core project sites and other
> project sites - istm that a different domain is the only way to do that.
Okay, then how about postgres-extra.net, or forpostgres.net?
Saying Postgres instead of PostgreSQL takes out a bit of that extra length
and it's lots easier to pronounce. We've been through this whole what-
shall-we-call-it thing months ago and IIRC the upshot was that the short
version of the name is perfectly acceptable and much catchier. Here's a
chance to use it!
Even shorter and catchier would be "pgprojects.net" IMHO, but that again
stretches the connection with PostgreSQL.
Jeroen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-12 15:04:20 | Re: index leaks ? |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-03-12 14:43:38 | Re: client side syntax error localisation for psql (v1) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-03-12 15:10:31 | FW: [webmaster] problem with gborg on Emacs-W3 browser |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-03-12 14:42:47 | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |