Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgFoundry

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgFoundry
Date: 2004-03-11 19:55:09
Message-ID: 200403111155.09851.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
Peter,

> Everybody had agreed to <project>.postgresql.net, and now it's gone 
> without explanation.

Oh!   Well, if that's what you want, why didn't you say so?   We can certainly 
change things since it's not official yet.

Like I said, I wasn't clear that there was a consensus for the postgresql.net 
scheme.   Can other people speak up about this?

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-11 20:29:29
Subject: Re: pgFoundry
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-03-11 19:38:56
Subject: Re: pgFoundry

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-11 20:29:29
Subject: Re: pgFoundry
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-03-11 19:38:56
Subject: Re: pgFoundry

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group