Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
Date: 2004-03-10 16:01:13
Message-ID: 200403101101.13262.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
On Tuesday 09 March 2004 16:53, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > Are you planning on running this along with the current website projects
> > (www/techdocs/etc...) or will this be independent?
>
> Independent.   Gforge is 90% dynamic content, and as such it won't fit in
> with the mirroring scheme for Portal.
>

even if doesnt fit into the mirroring scheme that doesnt mean it has to be 
seperate.... techdocs/advocacy arnt mirrored...  just wondering if discussion 
on its development would take place here so everyone is in the loop... that 
type of thing...

>  ie. There was
>
> > previous discussion of a projects.postgresql.net domain to be used for
> > this, is that deprecated?
>
> The guys (Andrew, Marc, etc.) liked www.pgfoundry.org more.  Several other
> addresses will be configured to point to this one.
>

hmm...from an advocacy point istm this would be a good place to play up the 
postgresql brand, such that it is... but ce la vei i guess

> >Also for theming, shouldn't it use the main
> > postgresql.org css ?
>
> Can't AFAIK, GForge is not xhtml/css-based.   Gforge formatting is
> database-centric.

It uses css for sure... just a question of where its going to pull it from... 
if they want to be seperate though i guess a different look/feel would be the 
way to go. (It's just counter to what people have complained about in the 
past with gborg...)


Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-03-10 16:43:44
Subject: Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-10 15:57:40
Subject: Please update the on-line docs for 7.4.2

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-10 16:12:34
Subject: Re: question about char/wchar/mb utils
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-10 16:00:39
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] log_line_info

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group