Re: How many Libraries of Congress can PostgreSQL

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How many Libraries of Congress can PostgreSQL
Date: 2004-03-09 09:27:53
Message-ID: 200403090927.54035.dev@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Monday 08 March 2004 23:29, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Apparently, it can manage at least one of 'em.
> >
> > http://gcn.com/23_5/tech-report/25133-1.html
>
> Cool!!! But I was a little bothered by this backhanded comment:
>
> She described the software as "one step up from MySQL," a popular
> open-source database manager.

To be fair, a similar phrase was used for the moon landings - you'll probably
find the second half of the quote got edited out ;-)

Good association for PG though

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-09 18:22:24 Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-03-09 01:31:46 Re: How many Libraries of Congress can PostgreSQL