Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 regression test status

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"'pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 regression test status
Date: 2004-03-08 18:35:05
Message-ID: 200403081835.i28IZ5q11376@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Claudio Natoli wrote:
> 
> [resurrecting this thread from the dead]
> 
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > It's not mandated but we need to know why this platform acts 
> > differently from the rest.  The join failures look like it may be an issue
> 
> > of the qsort() implementation acting differently for equal keys than most
> do.
> > Not sure whether the same applies to rules.
> 
> Any "off the top of the head" ideas on how to confirm/test this? Or how to
> proceed otherwise?

Uh, I think you just add ORDER BY to the query and see if the output now
matches the regression test.  If so, submit a patch to add the ORDER BY.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-08 18:38:52
Subject: Re: Win32 regression test status
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-03-08 17:30:41
Subject: Re: Tablespaces

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group