Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> > Are there any other platforms which don't have unix sockets?
> There are a couple, although I think those ports may be moribund
> (if anyone still cares about BeOS, they haven't mentioned it lately).
> > Perhaps we should force it to open a tcp socket on 127.0.0.1 only? That
> > way we don't suddenly open up to external connections without the user
> > asking for it.
> That seems like a reasonable compromise.
Agreed, but how do we do that. pg_hba.conf already only listens on
127.0.0.1. Do we ignore non-local IPs in that file until they use -i?
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andreas Pflug||Date: 2004-03-05 15:33:30|
|Subject: Re: A plan to improve error messages with context, hint|
|Previous:||From: Mark Gibson||Date: 2004-03-05 15:28:51|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Any Gentoo users interested in a slotted PostgreSQL|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Oleg Lebedev||Date: 2004-03-05 15:37:16|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction|
|Previous:||From: Fabien COELHO||Date: 2004-03-05 15:29:57|
|Subject: Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)|
pgsql-hackers-win32 by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2004-03-05 15:41:12|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-03-05 15:14:50|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 build under MINGW |