Re: BUG #1093: wrong handling of additional parameters in init

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #1093: wrong handling of additional parameters in init
Date: 2004-03-04 16:45:35
Message-ID: 200403041645.i24GjZ116738@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


We have nothing to do with that script. Contact your RPM packager or
Linux distributor.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

PostgreSQL Bugs List wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 1093
> Logged by: Konstantin Pelepelin
>
> Email address: cat(at)dtf(dot)ru
>
> PostgreSQL version: 7.3.4
>
> Operating system: Linux
>
> Description: wrong handling of additional parameters in init script
>
> Details:
>
> I use RPMs for linux, which contain file
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/postgresql
>
> Version for PostgreSQL 7.3.x contains some logic based on the name of script
> NAME=`basename $0`
> I assume, it is for support of multiple postmasters using additional files
> /etc/sysconfig/pgsql/${NAME}
>
> But this variable is dependable of whether this script was called by hand
> from its main location as postgresql (or using RedHat's 'service postgresql
> start') or from /etc/rc.d/rc (through symlink as S85postgresql)
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-04 16:55:59 Re: BUG #1093: wrong handling of additional parameters in init script
Previous Message PostgreSQL Bugs List 2004-03-04 16:33:40 BUG #1093: wrong handling of additional parameters in init script