Re: Tablespaces

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, "Alex J(dot) Avriette" <alex(at)posixnap(dot)net>, Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tablespaces
Date: 2004-03-03 04:34:55
Message-ID: 200403030434.i234YtK27793@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

Tom Lane wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> > Is possible / reasonable / smart and or dumb to look at implementing the
> > tablespaces as riding atop the initlocation handled stuff.
>
> In my mind, one of the main benefits of this work will be that we'll be
> able to get *rid* of the initlocation stuff. It's a crock.

Agreed. It should be ripped out once we have tablespaces, and if we keep
it for one extra release, there will be confusion over which to use.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-03 04:37:15 Re: Tablespaces
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-03 04:33:58 Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-03 04:39:53 Re: Tablespaces
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-03 04:33:58 Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces