Re: Publish SPF records for postgresql.org?

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Jonathan M. Gardner wrote:

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> /usr/local/libexec/ppf_verify: pgp command failed
>
> gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
> gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 2 13:15:55 2004 AST using DSA key ID C546970C
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there any reason not to publish SPF records for postgresql.org? Do we
> have control over the TXT records, and does anyone know which servers are
> authorized to send mail for postgresql.org? How do we handle mail
> forwarding for those who own an @postgresql.org email address?

Until today, I didn't know what SPF records were ...

We have control over everything, but as for sending mail 'for
postgresql.org', there are *alot* of them, since we have several relay
servers provided by various ppl around the world to spread the load of
distribution for the mailing lists ...

as to mail forwarding, each person has the ability to add a Sieve filter
to forward as they desire, or read straight off the main server ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664