Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Enterprice support in PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "George A(dot)J" <jinujosein(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: snaga(at)postgresql(dot)jp, snaga(at)snaga(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us,pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Enterprice support in PostgreSQL
Date: 2004-02-29 02:44:58
Message-ID: 200402290244.i1T2iwd18859@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-sql
George A.J wrote:
> Hi all,
>  
> We are providing database solutions in postgreSQL...
> Now using PostgreSQL 7.3. It is performing well. 
> But Now we have some enterprice level requirements.
> One of Our requirement is to provide a distributed solution in PostgreSQL.
> The questions are...
> 1. Is it posible to provide a distributed solution in PostgreSQL.
> 2. Does PostgreSQL Support distributed transactions. 
> 3. If not does it included in the next release. Or when will be the distributed version of postgreSQL available.
> 4. Is there a replication solution availbale for postgreSQL.
> 5. Does postgreSQL support 2 phase commit and Distributed transaction standards.
> 6. Is there a transaction manager(or co-ordinater) available for postgreSQL.
> 7. Can we use MTS (Microsot Transaction Server) wtih postgreSQL. 
> 8. Does postgreSQL support Load balancing and all other enterprice features.
> Can we expect these features in the next version..

We are working on all these fronts.  We have replication solutions on
gborg.postgresql.org, and some are working on 2-phase commit, perhaps
for 7.5, dues in maybe 6 months.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tim LarsonDate: 2004-02-29 03:03:33
Subject: Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-29 02:30:55
Subject: Re: 7.3.6 for Monday ... still a go?

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Terence KearnsDate: 2004-02-29 12:36:15
Subject: returning a recordset from PLpg/SQL
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-02-28 16:18:53
Subject: Re: User defined types -- Social Security number...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group