Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-26 22:45:05
Message-ID: 200402262345.05483.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www

Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I looked into that when core started discussing this whole
> thing awhile back. The Red Hat port of BZ to Postgres is perfectly
> usable.

Is it available anywhere?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-26 22:47:20 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-02-26 22:29:38 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-26 22:47:20 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-02-26 22:42:47 Re: Tablespaces

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-26 22:47:20 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-02-26 22:42:47 Re: Tablespaces

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-02-26 22:45:19 Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-26 22:37:42 Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?