Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-26 22:45:05
Message-ID: 200402262345.05483.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-www
Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I looked into that when core started discussing this whole
> thing awhile back.  The Red Hat port of BZ to Postgres is perfectly
> usable.

Is it available anywhere?


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-02-26 22:45:19
Subject: Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-02-26 22:37:42
Subject: Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-26 22:47:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-26 22:29:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-26 22:47:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-26 22:42:47
Subject: Re: Tablespaces

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-26 22:47:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-26 22:42:47
Subject: Re: Tablespaces

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group