Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-26 20:28:44
Message-ID: 200402261228.44788.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-www
Peter,

> So yes, I 
> think this is a reasonable plan, just don't expect "collaboration" to 
> suddenly appear out of nowhere.

Yeah.  As my grandfather used to say, "You can lead a horse to water, but you 
can't make him shrink."  (granddad is under care, now).

Everyone:  Further data: if we prefer BugZilla to GForge's lighter-weight bug 
tracking, it turns out that there is a BZ plug-in for GForge. 

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: David CostaDate: 2004-02-26 20:31:17
Subject: Upgraded Site..any news ?
Previous:From: Jeroen T. VermeulenDate: 2004-02-26 20:28:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-02-26 20:32:05
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Previous:From: Jeroen T. VermeulenDate: 2004-02-26 20:28:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2004-02-26 20:38:47
Subject: Re: ORDER BY different locales
Previous:From: Jeroen T. VermeulenDate: 2004-02-26 20:28:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-26 20:41:26
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Jeroen T. VermeulenDate: 2004-02-26 20:28:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group