Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pl/Java - next step?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pl/Java - next step?
Date: 2004-02-23 16:14:09
Message-ID: 200402231714.09095.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> 1. Select Pl/Java_JNI.
> 2. Select Pl/Java_remote
> 3. Choose both and agree on the SQL + Java semantics
> 4. Make the postmaster spawn threads rather than processes
> (controversial? Nah :-) )

Option 5 (or 0) would be to use GCJ.  This is likely to be the fastest 
and most lightweight solution, but perhaps not the most featureful.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-02-23 17:32:39
Subject: Re: Pl/Java - next step?
Previous:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2004-02-23 15:57:40
Subject: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it required?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group