Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...
Date: 2004-02-18 19:52:20
Message-ID: 200402181952.i1IJqKV00955@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Larry Rosenman wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> 
> 
> --On Wednesday, February 18, 2004 13:56:14 -0500 Bruce Momjian 
> <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> 
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > The question is whether we should have a GUC variable to control no
> > waiting on locks or add NO WAIT to specific SQL commands.
> >
> > Does anyone want to vote _against_ the GUC idea for nowait locking.  (We
> > already have two voting for such a variable.)
> >
> > If there is no one except Tom, we can continue.
> I'm with Tom.  Playing with *ALL* locks is just asking for TROUBLE.

OK, seems folks want the NO WAIT to apply only to the requested lock,
and want syntax to show that.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: eleinDate: 2004-02-18 20:05:47
Subject: Re: CHAR(n) always trims trailing spaces in 7.4
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-02-18 19:49:29
Subject: Re: NO WAIT ...

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-02-18 21:42:14
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-02-18 19:49:29
Subject: Re: NO WAIT ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group