Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > We will document this on the win32 TODO list and remove this patch once
> > MinGW is fixed.
> IIRC, Tom and I both suggested that there is no need to clutter the
> source tree with a temporary workaround for a platform that hasn't
> even seen a stable release yet. Or did I miss something...?
And I replied stating I would apply the patch and add a mention on the
Win32 TODO list to remove it once the platform fixes the problem. That
seems like the only useful solution.
I don't see a problem with adding it as long as we don't forget to
remove it once it is fixed.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-02-13 14:41:22|
|Subject: Re: ANALYZE patch for review |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-02-13 14:15:54|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again|