Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA
Date: 2004-02-09 04:52:13
Message-ID: 20040209005108.Q4449@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-general
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Marc,
>
> > now if they only had PostgreSQL on the list, it would be worth rallying
> > about ...
>
> It is on the list.   Look again.  We're there as Postgres.

You'd think that, of all ppl. O'Reilly would know the correct spelling ...
but, then again, you'd like that the advocacy group would try and correct
that, no?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-02-09 05:00:01
Subject: First rule of advocacy ... I think ...
Previous:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2004-02-08 20:21:36
Subject: Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: David GaramondDate: 2004-02-09 05:06:41
Subject: disallowing multiple NULLs in a unique constraint
Previous:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2004-02-09 04:18:30
Subject: Re: fsync = true beneficial on ext3?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group