Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA
Date: 2004-02-09 04:52:13
Message-ID: 20040209005108.Q4449@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Marc,
>
> > now if they only had PostgreSQL on the list, it would be worth rallying
> > about ...
>
> It is on the list. Look again. We're there as Postgres.

You'd think that, of all ppl. O'Reilly would know the correct spelling ...
but, then again, you'd like that the advocacy group would try and correct
that, no?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-02-09 05:00:01 First rule of advocacy ... I think ...
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-02-08 20:21:36 Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Garamond 2004-02-09 05:06:41 disallowing multiple NULLs in a unique constraint
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2004-02-09 04:18:30 Re: fsync = true beneficial on ext3?