Re: Updated Status (1/23/04) OSCON plans

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Updated Status (1/23/04) OSCON plans
Date: 2004-02-07 00:15:37
Message-ID: 200402061615.37958.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Robert,

> I've been waffling on this same issue actually. One of the presentations
> is going to be a "using advanced database features to reduce application
> re-coding". It will mainly deal with views and stored procedures as a
> talk, but I could go into more detail if they want a full blown
> tutorial. Is there any reason not to submit it both ways and let them
> pick which one they prefer? assuming they prefer either ;-)

Actually, "they" is quite intimate; primary selection will be done by several
members of the PG community, with OSCON just exercising veto power. So it
won't be strangers evaluating your proposal!

The hard part will be deciding who doesn't get to present at all :-(

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2004-02-07 16:55:47 Re: BSDCan 2004
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-02-06 22:18:15 Re: BSDCan 2004