| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Bruno BAGUETTE <pgsql-ml(at)baguette(dot)net> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Increase performance of a UNION query that thakes | 
| Date: | 2004-02-06 15:52:24 | 
| Message-ID: | 20040206074755.M86604@megazone.bigpanda.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance | 
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Bruno BAGUETTE wrote:
> I was thinking that a index on lower(substr(l_name, 1, 1)) and another
> index on lower(substr(org_name, 1, 1)) should gives better performances.
> When I've to create theses two indexes, it seems like this is not
> allowed :
>
> levure=> CREATE INDEX firstchar_lastname_idx ON
> people(lower(substr(l_name, 1, 1)));
> ERROR:  parser: parse error at or near "(" at character 59
In 7.4, I believe you would say
 on people((lower(substr(l_name,1,1))))
but I'm not sure that index would really help in practice.
> Do you have another idea to get better performances ?
In addition to what Tom said, the row estimates look suspiciously default.
You mention vacuuming, but do you ever analyze the tables?
Also, what do you have sort_mem set to?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno BAGUETTE | 2004-02-06 16:34:48 | RE : Increase performance of a UNION query that thakes 655.07 msec to be runned ? | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-06 15:28:24 | Re: Increase performance of a UNION query that thakes 655.07 msec to be runned ? |