Re: PITR Dead horse?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PITR Dead horse?
Date: 2004-02-05 14:57:28
Message-ID: 200402051457.i15EvSu26205@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr

Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Has this been beaten to death now? Just curious if PITR was in Dev tree
> > yet. Been out of the loop. TIA.
>
> I and my co workers are very interested in implementing PITR. We will
> tackle this for 7.5 if no one objects.

I have put up a PITR project page:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/project

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-05 14:59:17 Re: PITR Dead horse?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-02-05 14:54:49 Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint

Browse pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-05 14:59:17 Re: PITR Dead horse?
Previous Message Nicolai Tufar 2004-02-05 00:00:52 Re: PITR Dead horse?