Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again
Date: 2004-02-03 16:14:34
Message-ID: 200402031614.i13GEY310454@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Tom Lane said:
> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> >> I'm not sure I understand. I didn't suggest that a sequence should be
> >> used for txn ids. For the purpose I had in mind we would call
> >> nextval() once per connection,
> >
> > Oh, okay, I misunderstood. But why not just use the PID?
> >
>
> Bruce and others have suggested that PID is not sufficiently unique.
> Personally, I can live with it :-)

The nice things about using xid for session id is that is is unique for
a long time, rather than pid.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-03 16:26:03 Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-03 16:12:49 Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-03 16:26:34 Re: fix memcpy() overlap
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-03 16:12:03 Re: session IDs