On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> So, what I'd like to do is make btree index creation pay attention to
> vacuum_mem instead of sort_mem, and rename the vacuum_mem parameter to
> some more-generic name indicating that it's used for more than just
> VACUUM. Any objections so far?
Why not create a seperate index_mem variable instead? index creation
tends to be, I think, less frequent then vacuum, so having a higher value
for index_mem then vacuum_mem may make sense ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-01-31 22:29:26|
|Subject: Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-01-31 22:00:25|
|Subject: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory|