| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Lamb <slamb(at)slamb(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com>, Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Mixing threaded and non-threaded |
| Date: | 2004-01-30 17:25:05 |
| Message-ID: | 200401301725.i0UHP5i12779@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Scott Lamb wrote:
> Speaking of async signal-safe functions, pthread_getspecific() isn't
> specified to be (and thus PQinSend() and thus
> sigpipe_handler_ignore_send()). It's probably okay, but libpq is
> technically using undefined behavior according to SUSv3.
Yikes. I never suspected pthread_getspecific() would not be signal safe
because it is already thread safe, but I see the point that it is called
in the current thread. Any ideas how to fix this?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | BARTKO, Zoltan | 2004-01-30 17:33:09 | Re: msg translation into sk_SK, Docs: SGML -> XML |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-01-30 17:21:54 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint |