| From: | markw(at)osdl(dot)org |
|---|---|
| To: | dave(at)hub(dot)org |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on |
| Date: | 2004-01-28 18:36:39 |
| Message-ID: | 200401281836.i0SIaqo25693@mail.osdl.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
On 23 Jan, Dave Thompson wrote:
> Hello All
>
> Just wanted to gather opinions on what file system has the best balance between performance and reliability when used on a quad processor machine running SuSE64. Thanks
>
> DAve
Hi Dave,
I have some data for performance using our DBT-2 workload (OLTP type
transactions) with Linux-2.6 with various filesystems and i/o
schedulers. I know it doesn't address the reliability part of your
question, and it's in a completely different environment (32-bit as well
as a different distro), but if you think you'll find the results
interesting:
http://developer.osdl.org/markw/fs/project_results.html
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris White (cjwhite) | 2004-01-28 19:48:20 | Re: Error seen when vacuuming pg_largeobject table |
| Previous Message | Chris White (cjwhite) | 2004-01-27 21:41:45 | Re: Error seen when vacuuming pg_largeobject table |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Loeke | 2004-01-28 18:56:46 | views? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-28 16:49:12 | Re: [SQL] postgres timeout. |