Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Date: 2004-01-23 20:50:56
Message-ID: 20040123205056.GA12933@phlogiston.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-performance
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:05:41AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/

Yes, I guess I shoulda thought of that, eh?  Thanks.  The docs do
suggest that there are some significant differences between the two
versions of the filesystem, so I'm not sure how sanguine I'd be about
the degree of "testing" the filesystem has received on Linux.  On the
other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if it were no worse than the
other options.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
		--Philip Greenspun

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-01-23 20:56:18
Subject: Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Previous:From: Karl VogelDate: 2004-01-23 20:16:35
Subject: Re: Linux Cluster File Systems

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-01-23 20:56:18
Subject: Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Previous:From: Karl VogelDate: 2004-01-23 20:16:35
Subject: Re: Linux Cluster File Systems

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group