Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bricolage: Impressive

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>, david(at)kineticode(dot)com,PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Date: 2004-01-19 20:44:49
Message-ID: 20040119164323.C15422@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Marc,
>
> > That isn't an issue, I just need someone to tell me that this is what we
> > should be working on and I'll get it setup over here ...
>
> From my experience, Bricolage needs its own (virtual) server, and preferably
> its own machine.   It's not set up to share resources.

k, seperate VM isn't an issue ... but what is it doing that it needs its
own machine?  God, I thought Java programs were the worst, you are saying
that this needs more then jakarta-tomcat processes?

David?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-01-19 21:00:47
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-01-19 20:34:42
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group