| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>, david(at)kineticode(dot)com, PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bricolage: Impressive |
| Date: | 2004-01-18 05:47:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20040118014331.Y13900@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
David, can you add some input into this? The thread starts:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2004-01/msg00188.php
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > do we have anyone that is against using this? Steve seems to
> > indicate that this could be used for not just techdocs, but for the
> > other sites as well ... do we want to look at this too, since Oleg
> > seems to indicate the whole internationalization stuff shouldn't be
> > an issue using it?
>
> I read that he indicated that internationalization *is* an issue if you
> have lots of languages and frequent, irregular updates. To me, keeping
> the translations inline seems OK for a couple of languages and small
> sites, but for what we're talking about here it seems shortsighted.
>
>
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2004-01-18 07:23:22 | Re: Bricolage: Impressive |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-01-18 02:56:40 | Re: And now for an example of a different style of |