From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: psql \d option list overloaded |
Date: | 2004-01-12 17:48:43 |
Message-ID: | 200401121848.43765.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> But this interacts with point 3 (psql breaks on every new backend
> version). It's not desirable to have every GUI and large custom
> program implementing its own set of metadata inquiry commands: they
> all have to go through the same update pain as psql. Perhaps if
> people start to rely on information_schema for those things, life
> will get better, but I'm unconvinced that will happen. psql itself
> certainly hasn't moved in that direction.
IIRC, the two killers in psql compatibility have been outer joins and
schemas. I don't see how we could have avoided that, except with
highly specialized and static (parameter-less) commands. There have
been additional minor issues, but I suppose we could have avoided those
if we had cared to do so at all.
Several people have in the past proposed to keep psql backward
compatible, even if only by means of
if (version =x) {
...
}
else if (version = y) {
...
}
(which would be fine by me), but apparently no one has felt pressed
enough yet.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-01-12 17:55:58 | Re: A cohesive sales message |
Previous Message | Dan Langille | 2004-01-12 17:30:47 | Re: BSDCan 2004 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-01-12 17:58:22 | Re: Case sensitivity |
Previous Message | Jeff Eckermann | 2004-01-12 17:47:56 | Re: what we need to use postgresql in the enterprise |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2004-01-12 17:56:32 | Re: Encoding problems in PostgreSQL with XML data |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-01-12 17:12:40 | Re: [HACKERS] IEEE 754 |