Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Claudio Natoli said:
> >
> >
> >> patch + new file attached. Haven't tested on Windows, but
> >> should be fine.
> >
> > Would be, except for a small typo (conditional operator has an
> > additional : instead of a ?).
>
> Darnit. please fix when applying.
>
> > Also, we might want to change to SleepEx,
> > depending on how we eventually get signals implemented, but that's a
> > story for another day.
> >
>
> Yes. If we use a separate thread to catch signal events then only calls in
> that thread would need to use SleepEx, no? Anyway, as you say if necessary
> it can be adjusted later.
>
> > This, + the pipe() patch from a couple days ago, means we can just
> > about tick off the "Problems with select()" item on the Win32 TODO list
> > :-)
> >
>
> That was the intention :-)
OK, Sleep() win32 patch attached and applied. We already had PG_DELAY
in milliseconds, and no one was going anywhere near 2000 seconds
(overflow), so I just converted it to PG_USLEEP and used it consistenly,
with the Win32 Sleep() call added.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073