Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>,PostgreSQL hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?
Date: 2004-01-02 05:15:14
Message-ID: 200401020515.i025FEe17756@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... copy the slock_t definition for hppa from hpux.h into linux.h ...
> 
> > I think he also has to modify src/include/port/linux.h to support the HP
> > processor.
> 
> That's what I said, I thought.

Oh, I saw slock_t definition and thought s_lock.h.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-01-02 06:09:12
Subject: Re: PL/Java issues
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2004-01-02 04:56:33
Subject: Re: time format

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Oliver ElphickDate: 2004-01-02 08:55:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-01-02 03:32:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group