From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Keith C(dot) Perry" <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com>, "pgsql-general (at) postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ? |
Date: | 2003-12-29 22:30:50 |
Message-ID: | 20031229223050.GA2629@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 17:16:55 -0500,
Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com> wrote:
>
> So what's the next step? Do we keep the docs as is with minor
> improvements as the backend gets upgraded from one version to the next,
> or do we really step up to the plate and make Postgresql accessible to
> many new users? Do we stay behind or move forward? Is where we are good
> enough now?
I don't aggree that splitting up the documentation into very small pages
is a good idea. Most of the other other suggestions you made seemed good.
I also think that using a local copie of the documentation needs to be doable
(though some features may be lost when using it this way).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Satrapa | 2003-12-29 22:32:52 | Recommended Reading List (was Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?) |
Previous Message | Ericson Smith | 2003-12-29 22:16:55 | Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Satrapa | 2003-12-29 22:32:52 | Recommended Reading List (was Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?) |
Previous Message | Manfred Spraul | 2003-12-29 22:28:08 | Re: update i386 spinlock for hyperthreading |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Satrapa | 2003-12-29 22:32:52 | Recommended Reading List (was Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?) |
Previous Message | Manfred Spraul | 2003-12-29 22:28:08 | Re: update i386 spinlock for hyperthreading |