Re: ISO year.

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ISO year.
Date: 2003-12-20 00:14:53
Message-ID: 200312200014.hBK0ErZ26505@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Karel Zak wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 08:18:08PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > DCH_IW,
> > + DCH_IYYY,
> > + DCH_IYY,
> > + DCH_IY,
> > + DCH_I,
>
> It's better :-) This patch is OK for me.

Which patch is OK? The one attached? You looked like you were making
changes to this patch in your later emails.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 11.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kurt Roeckx 2003-12-20 00:35:07 Re: ISO year.
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-12-19 17:50:06 Re: distinguish between all and "all" in pg_hba.conf