Re: [PATCHES] Numeric version of factorial()

I had to remove the factorial example from the casting docs because
factorial is now defined only for numeric. Would someone take the
attached example and make a new one with a different operator?

Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gavin Sherry wrote:
> Attached is a patch implementing factorial(), returning numeric. Points to
> note:
>
> 1) arttype is numeric. I thought this was the best way of allowing
> arbitarily large factorials, even though factorial(2^63) is a large
> number. Happy to change to integers if this is overkill.
> 2) since we're accepting numeric arguments, the patch tests for floats. If
> a numeric is passed with non-zero decimal portion, an error is raised
> since (from memory) they are undefined.
> 3) I have not removed factorial([int2|int4|int8]), not their operator
> counterparts since I didn't know what people would want done with these.
> 4) I haven't added any documentation but am happy to once I know if people
> want int or numeric arguments.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gavin

Content-Description:

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073