Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Call from Info World

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call from Info World
Date: 2003-11-30 18:02:08
Message-ID: 20031130135959.S36938@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Yes, you do, but in the open source world, you need several open source
> projects together to make something similar in functionality to Windows.

Right, what the end user (or distro) has to pull together in a symbiotic
relationship between projects, Microsoft acquires financially :)

> I am not saying that is wrong, and in fact it is often better, but you
> can't make a clear parallel between KDE and Windows, or Samba and
> Windows.  What you could do is to draw similarity between Windows and
> Linux/KDE/Samba, but that is quite a mouthful for people to understand ---
> it is 1 to 3, not one to 1 as it is with Oracle-PostgreSQL.

Only because Windows has 'acquired' the technology and bundled it as it
saw fit ... at one point, they were distinct parts ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-11-30 18:08:11
Subject: Re: Call from Info World
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-11-30 17:16:15
Subject: Re: Call from Info World

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group