From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Call from Info World |
Date: | 2003-11-30 04:51:00 |
Message-ID: | 200311300451.hAU4p0103640@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Oh, great, there goes that good example. Are we the only big
> > open-source project that isn't controlled by corporations?
>
> Certainly not.
>
> >> Other projects that I'mm pretty sure aren't corporate-run: Samba,
> >> Abiword, Gnucash, Webmin, OpenGroupware, Hordemail.
> >
> > And who has heard of those? NO ONE!
>
> You don't judge how big or how significant an OSS project is by how
> many people have heard of it. Judged by that criterion, we certainly
> don't do very well, for example.
We are doing much better than we used to. I would say most db guys not
involved in open source have heard of PostgreSQL at this point. Are
other people seeing this? I am.
>
> > Samba, maybe, but not really outside open-source circles.
>
> Compared to PostgreSQL, I'm sure Samba is FAR better known outside of
> OSS enthusiasts. The same applies to KDE, which you also suggested
> "isn't known outside open source".
One of the problems with using KDE or Samba is that there isn't
well-known commercial that has a similar function for comparison.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-30 04:58:51 | Re: Fwd: Re: [translators] 74 Release Monday |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-11-30 03:17:01 | Re: PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc., was Re: PostgreSQL is much |