Re: Fwd: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?
Date: 2003-11-20 05:37:45
Message-ID: 200311200037.45322.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 18:29, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Forwarding to the correct list: Hey guys!
>
> ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
>
> Subject: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?
> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:12:59 +0100 (CET)
> From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
> To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
> Cc: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>
> Josh Berkus writes:
> > Elein is correct, our variety of styles does look odd and can cause
> > issues with readability. See, for example,
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-string.html
> >
> > Can we experiment with different SGML-to-HMTL font styles to find one
> > that's
>
> a
>
> > little easier on the eyes? What I find particularly difficult are the
> > function parameter columns; the mix of "normal" italics with "bold"
> > italics.
>
> Compare with the "original" version:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/functions-string.html
>
> That looks fairly reasonable to me. So the problem appears to be in the
> CSS stylesheets.
>

not saying if its css one way or t'other, but it looks fine on the 7.3 doc
page...

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2003-11-20 07:30:38 Re: New Event
Previous Message World Wide Web Owner 2003-11-20 05:35:26 New Event