Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /.

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /.
Date: 2003-11-19 02:01:31
Message-ID: 200311190201.hAJ21VS25599@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> 
> 
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> > Never mind, Christopher Kings-Lynne got us on.
> > 
> > Go Chris!
> 
> Actually, what I notice is that back in 7.1 days, etc. SlashDot would be 
> full of people ripping off Postgres, nowadays it's 95% people in full 
> favour of Postgres and against MySQL.
> 
> Things have really changed for the better.

Yes!  I read the entire thread and our message is clearly getting out. 
I never would have seen that 2 years ago.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-11-19 02:02:05
Subject: Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /.
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-11-19 02:01:21
Subject: Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group