Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 02:41:20
Message-ID: 200311180241.hAI2fKk00107@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
>  > Also note that most major number
> > changes in the past weren't because the features were cool, but because
> > the project has moved to a new phase.  I don't see any such move
> > happening.
> 
> Now that is interesting.  I missed that.   Can you explain how that worked 
> with 7.0?

We stopped crashing in 7.0, or was it 6.5 --- that was our milestone, I
think.  :-)

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-11-18 02:45:43
Subject: Re: logical column position
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-11-18 02:35:21
Subject: Re: libpq thread safety

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2003-11-18 04:18:48
Subject: Press coverage in Australia
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2003-11-18 02:22:22
Subject: Re: advocacy.postgresql.org: page dedicated to

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group