| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Date: | 2003-11-17 23:35:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200311171535.13307.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Peter,
> As has been said before, many people think that a Windows port is the
> least interesting feature ever to happen to PostgreSQL, so you're going to
> have to come up with better reasons.
Yeah, I'm more interested in ARC and replication ... and the SQL
standardization that just went into 7.4.
> Also note that most major number
> changes in the past weren't because the features were cool, but because
> the project has moved to a new phase. I don't see any such move
> happening.
Now that is interesting. I missed that. Can you explain how that worked
with 7.0?
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | William Yu | 2003-11-17 23:43:07 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-17 23:31:24 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | William Yu | 2003-11-17 23:43:07 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-17 23:31:24 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |