Re: Help with count(*)

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Help with count(*)
Date: 2003-11-14 21:30:16
Message-ID: 20031114213015.GT28153@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:16:56PM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> otherwise-unoccupied connection in the pool, in effect, doing a sort
> of "vacuum" of the connections. I don't get very favorable reactions
> when I suggest that, though...

Because it's a kludge on top of another kludge, perhaps? ;-) This
needs to be fixed properly, not through an ungraceful series of
workarounds.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Castle 2003-11-14 21:45:58 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system
Previous Message Glenn Wiorek 2003-11-14 21:19:43 Re: [CORE] 7.4RC2 regression failur and not running stats collector process

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message George Essig 2003-11-14 22:02:38 Re: INSERT extremely slow with large data sets (fwd)
Previous Message Nick Fankhauser 2003-11-14 21:27:16 n_distinct way off, but following a pattern.